Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rampow technology

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles (talk) 00:28, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

=[[Rampow technology]]=

:{{la|Rampow technology}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Rampow_technology Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Rampow technology}})

Non-notable product without independent sources. – Gilliam (talk) 08:51, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

Speedy delete per WP:CSD#A7: does not indicate why its subject is important or significant. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 08:52, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2015 September 10. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 09:16, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- 1Wiki8Q5G7FviTHBac3dx8HhdNYwDVstR (talk) 10:07, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 20:05, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

Delete as there's hardly much info and my searches found nothing good. SwisterTwister talk 05:33, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.