Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Randall Hough

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. As only one comment has come in since the relist, not making a definitive argument for keeping or deleting, and no edits have been made since the AfD began, this seems the best option. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 16:46, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

=[[:Randall Hough]]=

:{{la|Randall Hough}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Randall_Hough Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Randall Hough}})

Deproded, fails WP:NCHESS, a USCF (former) official who doesn't even hold the lowest of the FIDE titles Sophia91 (talk) 01:11, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. Sophia91 (talk) 01:11, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Relisting comment: Reverting my initial close (was "delete") and relisting per a request from {{u|Atlantic306}} on my talk page, in the hopes that this debate will receive additional input. Note that this article has already been PRODded in 2007, declined by {{u|User At Work}}.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ST47 (talk) 21:35, 1 December 2019 (UTC)

So he doesn't pass WP:NCHESS as a player but are the administrative roles he served high enough to suggest notability and were his articles widely published ? Atlantic306 (talk) 00:09, 2 December 2019 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.