Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Randevyn

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. After reading through the OTRS ticket I'm left thinking that the subject (or his representatives) wished to get rid of this article so they could write another one, which would supposedly not mention the subject's musical career. Assuming that the subject does not meet our notability guidelines (consensus for that seems the be the case below), the deletion is not a problem. However, I'm also going to salt the title to prevent re-creation, and I'd invite any interested editors to read through WP:PSCOI and use Articles for Creation if they wish to recreate. Obviously we never discard a subject's history solely for their convenience and this might be simply a misunderstanding of how Wikipedia works, but again, if the subject does not meet the relevant notability guidelines then the point is moot in any case. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 21:56, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

=[[Randevyn]]=

:{{la|Randevyn}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Randevyn Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Randevyn}})

The subject has requested that I start an AfD on their behalf. The reason given is: 'I don't want to be

primarily known as a musician.' This in no way reflects my own thoughts or opinions. Please see OTRS ticket number 2015011810002041 for confirmation. Panyd^{The muffin is not subtle} 13:00, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. -- Sam ^Sing! 14:58, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- Sam ^Sing! 14:58, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of US-related deletion discussions. -- Sam ^Sing! 14:58, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

Delete - I'm not even sure there are sources out there to make subject pass WP:BIO. -- Sam ^Sing! 14:59, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Colorado-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:49, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:49, 31 January 2015 (UTC)

Delete This seems to be a lot of content for an article without references. I note that the article has been mostly authored by a SPA with over 500 edits on that page. I also found at least 3 other SPAs, but there were many others who contributed who are generalists on WP. The subject's own web site returns a 404. If this article had a few good references then it would have to stand, regardless of the desires of the subject. But it doesn't. Too bad, it's a nicely done article, better that most that we see here at AfD. LaMona (talk) 01:33, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.