Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Randox Laboratories

:{{la|Randox Laboratories}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Randox_Laboratories Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Randox Laboratories}})

Article created by (indef-blocked) WP:SPA {{user|RandoxLabs}}, with primary function of WP:ADVERT and WP:PROMO. — Cirt (talk) 22:02, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. — Cirt (talk) 22:11, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:35, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:36, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

Keep Yes it is badly written and PROMO, but it meets notability: [http://www.idaireland.com/en/newsroom/the-friday-interview-pete/ here], [http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-29686078 here], [http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-northern-ireland-12783093 here]. EBY (talk) 00:41, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

---

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 23:16, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

---

• Keep - Needs a lot of work, but is WP:GNG. VMS Mosaic (talk) 05:36, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
• Keep Does meet WP:GNG, but it was very promotional, so I deleted two promotional sections lacking reliable sources. --I am One of Many (talk) 08:01, 11 November 2014 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.