Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Randy Lee Cutler

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz talk 00:53, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

=[[Randy Lee Cutler]]=

:{{la|Randy Lee Cutler}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Randy_Lee_Cutler Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Randy Lee Cutler}})

WP:BLP, shading toward prosified résumé, of a writer and artist with no really strong claim to passing WP:CREATIVE. In addition, this is badly sourced: of the eight "references" here, seven of them directly credit the article topic as the author of the reference, making them primary sources which cannot demonstrate her notability — and the only one she didn't write herself is an interview with her on an arts organization's blog, which is still not a reliable source. A person does not get an automatic notability freebie on Wikipedia just because she exists — an article is earned by demonstrating that they have been the subject of reliable source coverage which properly verifies that they pass a specific inclusion criterion. Delete. Bearcat (talk) 18:41, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:44, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:44, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of British Columbia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:44, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:44, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

  • Delete as I found nothing better than some links at Books and browser. SwisterTwister talk 06:05, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —JAaron95 Talk 18:28, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.