Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rango Bapuji Gupte

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Logan _Talk ^{Contributions} 00:10, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

=[[Rango Bapuji Gupte]]=

:{{la|Rango Bapuji Gupte}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|Rango Bapuji Gupte}})

non notable person WuhWuzDat 16:42, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

Keep Despite the nominator's three word argument that this is a "non notable person", the article asserts notability, saying he was a freedom fighter in the 1857 uprising in India, a revolutionary, and that he spent 14 years in Britain pleading the Indian cause. A Google search confirms that this is all true, and that he was a notable figure in Indian history as attested by many reliable sources. Cullen328 (talk) 18:03, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:58, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:59, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:59, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
Keep One just has to look at the gbooks link that comes with the nomination to assess notability. Cullen328 has also sourced the article. —SpacemanSpiff 07:23, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
Keep. A quick WP:BEFORE would have indicated notability, as has been determined. The subject for the article is noteworthy and reliably sourcable as same. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 16:21, 31 January 2011 (UTC)

::Comment I've expanded the article a bit, and added some references. Cullen328 (talk) 16:28, 31 January 2011 (UTC)

Keep. Notable even if he was an Indian. Hawkeye7 (talk) 20:02, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
Keep - the article claims the subject was a diplomat for the independent state of Satara and a key figure in the Indian Rebellion of 1857, both of which are supported by reliable sources. As such the subject seems to be notable under WP:GNG. Anotherclown (talk) 05:04, 5 February 2011 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.