Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rare Disease Research

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=Wikipedia%3AXFDcloser%2FSoft_deletion_refund_preload&preloadparams%5b%5d={{urlencode:Rare Disease Research}}&preloadparams%5b%5d={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rare Disease Research}}&editintro=Wikipedia%3AXFDcloser%2FSoft_deletion_refund_intro&preloadtitle={{urlencode:Rare Disease Research}}§ion=new&title=Wikipedia%3ARequests_for_undeletion&create=Request request the article's undeletion]. ✗plicit 14:13, 20 May 2025 (UTC)

=[[:Rare Disease Research]]=

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|1=Rare Disease Research}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Rare Disease Research}})

This is a small contract research organization that contributes a small part to large international trials run by others. I don't think that this would be evident to readers, which makes this article primarily promotional in nature. It would be helpful to have independent reliable sources that have the centre itself, rather than the trials to which it contributes, as the focus. I haven't been able to find any, and have not had any response to notability tagging since February. Klbrain (talk) 08:09, 13 May 2025 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.