Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Red Bee (band)
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 06:15, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
=[[Red Bee (band)]]=
:{{la|Red Bee (band)}} – (
:({{Find sources|Red Bee (band)}})
Poorly sourced, relying entirely on primary and unreliable sources, of a band with no strong claim to passing WP:NMUSIC. As usual, I'm willing to withdraw this if the sourcing can be beefed up properly, but they're not entitled to keep an unsourced advertisement on Wikipedia for promotional purposes. Delete. Bearcat (talk) 01:31, 29 July 2014 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 01:51, 29 July 2014 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 01:51, 29 July 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. This [http://www.loudmag.com.au/content/red-bee-ictus album review] is the best I could find in terms of coverage, which is to say that there does not appear to be sufficient material from reliable sources for this group to WP:GNG or WP:BAND. Gongshow talk 03:50, 29 July 2014 (UTC)
- Delete, I don't see how they could meet any of the WP:MUSIC criteria at this time. Lankiveil (speak to me) 02:47, 4 August 2014 (UTC).
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.