Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Red Bloom of the Boom

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was withdrawn. (non-admin closure) Jinkinson talk to me 22:47, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

=[[Red Bloom of the Boom]]=

:{{la|Red Bloom of the Boom}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Red_Bloom_of_the_Boom Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Red Bloom of the Boom}})

A studio album that looks like it can just be redirected to the band. Wgolf (talk) 21:13, 26 September 2014 (UTC)Withdrawn

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 21:27, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

:Keep It's got enough coverage in reliable sources to meet WP:NALBUMS, e.g. the following: [http://pitchfork.com/reviews/albums/10886-red-bloom-of-the-boom/] [http://www.allmusic.com/album/red-bloom-of-the-boom-mw0000490762] [http://www.popmatters.com/review/bear-in-heaven-red-bloom-of-the-boom/] [http://www.avclub.com/review/bear-in-heaven-emred-bloom-of-the-boomem-7410] Jinkinson talk to me 21:29, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

  • :-thanks about that, I actually felt bad after putting that tag-I was thinking that is just needs refs not a AFD. Wgolf (talk) 21:41, 26 September 2014 (UTC)
  • :-Withdrawn-well the AFD actually did help in a way again! Anyway this has enough info so withdrawing and speedy keep! Wgolf (talk) 21:50, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.