Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Red fascism

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|Red fascism}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Red fascism}})

The page is focused on a term which is a WP:CFORK from this section. It does not add anything other than being truly a shortlist of people (scholastic or not) who have used the term as well vis-à-vis citations, stripping all the context in this article, producing thus IMO a WP:POVFORK article. BunnyyHop (^talk) 22:08, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:26, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

:Keep, can't speak of whether it's a WP:CFORK or not but it does seem like there are several sources which speak of a "Red Fascism" using that specific phrase. WP:NOTCLEANUP applies.--22:52, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. CommanderWaterford (talk) 23:15, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

• Keep The page which the nominator prefers is too large per WP:SIZESPLIT and so some sub-division is reasonable per WP:SPINOFF. The page in question is focussed on a concept which is notable by that title, being the specific topic of papers such as [https://www.jstor.org/stable/1852269?seq=1 this]. Andrew🐉(talk) 23:48, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
• Keep: Article clearly meets GNG, well sourced term. This editor has been POV pushing to remove content they don't agree with and this is part of that pattern. They are now attempting to use AfD to push their POV. There is currently an ANI about their POV pushing to removed negative information about communism and insert positive information about communism.  // Timothy :: talk  19:27, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
• Keep. This is a well defined separate topic. And the page can be actually expanded. For example, Aleksandr Dugin in his article, "Fascism – Borderless and Red", proclaimed the arrival of a "genuine, true, radically revolutionary and consistent, fascist fascism" in Russia. My very best wishes (talk) 01:35, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.