Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Redbus.in
=[[Redbus.in]]=
:{{la|Redbus.in}} ([{{fullurl:Redbus.in|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Redbus.in}}&action=delete}} delete]) –
nn website Gotttor (talk) 01:51, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
- Keep. I don't understand this nomination. Six credible and reliable sources are referenced in the article, providing the substantial coverage to pass the general notability guideline that the nominator didn't even have to do a search to see notability. -SpacemanSpiff (talk) 02:07, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. -- SpacemanSpiff (talk) 02:08, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. -- SpacemanSpiff (talk) 02:08, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- SpacemanSpiff (talk) 02:09, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
- Keep Notable as the first online booking system in India for busses(Dont know about the rest of the world). Worth a keep; needs to be rewritten in an encyclopedic form. --Deepak D'Souza 05:58, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:10, 8 July 2009 (UTC){{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Redbus.in||}}
- Keep. Notability is well-demonstrated by the sources in the article. Phil Bridger (talk) 08:48, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.