Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Redecard

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. ---Balloonman NO! I'm Spartacus! 00:30, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

=[[Redecard]]=

:{{la|Redecard}} ([{{fullurl:Redecard|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Redecard}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Speedied as G11, recreated. Logo is copyvio that has been reuploaded multiple times. Putting it up for consensus rather than continuing a shell game of delete and recreation. Talain (talk) 15:51, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

  • Keep. Company is notable enough. It is the 2nd largest credit card processor in Brazil (after Visanet). The logo copyright issue is another matter that should be dealt separately. -- Alexf(talk) 15:06, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Keep - The company is a major credit card transaction processor. Coverage in the business press is extensive. Examples include [http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601086&sid=akpJ0.xsXKLI], [http://www.latinbusinesschronicle.com/app/article.aspx?id=1507], [http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601086&sid=awfrTGA69cbw], [http://money.cnn.com/2001/03/21/emerging_markets/bna_summary/index.htm]. The issue of the logo is one of editting and is not a reason for deleting an entire article. Nor is the current material overtly promotional. -- Whpq (talk) 12:06, 7 July 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.