Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Redscroll Records

:{{la|Redscroll Records}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Redscroll_Records Stats])

:({{Find sources|Redscroll Records}})

Lacks coverage in multiple reliable sources. No evidence of notability per WP:CORP. Kinu ^t/_c 16:07, 5 October 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 18:02, 5 October 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Connecticut-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 18:02, 5 October 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 18:02, 5 October 2012 (UTC)

:Are the references and copy that have been added today sufficient enough to fulfill your requirements? ECR (talk) 21:08, 5 October 2012 (UTC)

• Keep Numerous cited references as well as discography have been added to the article in addition to templates, inclusion in Connecticut portal, as well as a proper infobox. It is in much better shape than it was when initially recommended for deletion. ECR (talk) 15:08, 6 October 2012 (UTC)
• Delete absence of reliable independent sources to establish notability. Fails the WP:GNG. Vcessayist (talk) 02:04, 7 October 2012 (UTC)

: It seems that Pitchfork, Goldmine_(magazine), and Record-Journal should count as reliable independent sources, no? ECR (^tlk/_ctr) 16:36, 8 October 2012 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.