Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rees Associates Architects

:{{la|Rees Associates Architects}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Rees_Associates_Architects Stats])

:({{Find sources|Rees Associates Architects}})

Appears to be a non-notable company. The article has two questionable refs, and Google has returned little else. – GorillaWarfare (talk) 16:38, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

• Delete - Search only finds company listings and passing mentions. --| Uncle Milty | talk | 16:48, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Sir Rcsprinter, Bt (deliver) @ 17:36, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

• Delete The nearest to a claim to notability in the article is being named "one of the 200 fastest-growing firms in the architecture, engineering, and environmental consulting industry" one year. Aside from that I can find passing mentions about them moving into a new office space, but neither these nor the one-of-200 meets :WP:CORPDEPTH. AllyD (talk) 18:33, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:05, 3 June 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:05, 3 June 2013 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:05, 3 June 2013 (UTC)

• Delete - Does not meet GNG or CORP. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 21:24, 7 June 2013 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.