Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reflexive Human Science

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete g11, advertising for selfpublished book. NawlinWiki (talk) 16:33, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

=[[Reflexive Human Science]]=

:{{la|Reflexive Human Science}} ([{{fullurl:Reflexive Human Science|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reflexive Human Science}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Google brings up only a dozen or so hits for this, many of which deal with self-reflexive human science. I think this implies sub-borderline notability for this topic, at least at present. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 16:17, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

Delete, nonnotable term, seems to be promoting the selfpublished book which is the only cited source. NawlinWiki (talk) 16:28, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
Comment Feel free to speedy it as spam in that case. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 16:32, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
OK. NawlinWiki (talk) 16:33, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.