Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reformed systematic theology bibliography
=[[:Reformed systematic theology bibliography]]=
{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|M}}
:{{la|1=Reformed systematic theology bibliography}} – (
:({{Find sources AFD|title=Reformed systematic theology bibliography}})
without sources and all material is a newspaper archive or redirect to Systematic theology
Iban14mxl (talk) 01:00, 21 April 2025 (UTC)
- Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2025 April 21. —cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 01:25, 21 April 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bibliographies and Christianity. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:36, 21 April 2025 (UTC)
- Speedy Keep: I don't see any valid rationale here. (The books themselves are sources, so it is not unsourced.) I don't see anything to do with a {{tq|newspaper archive}}. These kinds of bibliographies have a valid rationale as standalone articles (see WP:BIB). This appears to be a malformed nomination from [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Iban14mxl&diff=prev&oldid=1286321338 someone who has recently been warned by Liz for their AfD activity]. Dclemens1971 (talk) 18:03, 21 April 2025 (UTC)
- Keep as not seeing a valid deletion reason and the list is a useful navigation tool for researching the notable authors listed, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 20:26, 21 April 2025 (UTC)