Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Regal Lager
=[[Regal Lager]]=
{{ns:0|O}}
:{{la|Regal Lager}} ([{{fullurl:Regal Lager|wpReason={{urlencode:AfD discussion: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Regal Lager}}&action=delete}} delete]) –
subject fails WP:CORP; uses only one source, and was started by a promotional name account. New user editing removed prod without discussion. - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 15:17, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
- Delete Original author is in all likelihood an SPA. Google search resulted in mostly shopping sites, with a few beer pages thrown in. One award from one newspaper, even the AJC, is not sufficient coverage, no matter how many copies of the same article pop up around the internet. The award isn't even related to their core business. DarkAudit (talk) 15:28, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
- Delete per my prod rationale: Promotional in tone, and the only reference is written by the company itself, so hardly independent. Suggest deletion on grounds of WP:Notability and WP:Verifiability —Preceding unsigned comment added by Marasmusine (talk • contribs) 15:49, March 25, 2008
- Delete. Cites no sources, asserts no notability; fails WP:RS. — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 15:49, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
- Delete Lacks notability. Lawrence § t/e 18:00, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
- Keep. WP:Verifiability and WP:Notability have been improved with addition of references. Neutrality is on par with other articles of this type.TurinDesk (talk) 18:47, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.