Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Regina Davis

:{{la|Regina Davis}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Regina_Davis Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Regina Davis}})

Article about a not notable person; she was an administrator of a school that isn't even named, and she was beaten. That's not a biography. I would say it's WP:BLP1E, but I don't even see that she is even notable for one event. Is there a WP:BLP0E? --GRuban (talk) 19:59, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

• Delete - Subject lacks any kind of notability. Meatsgains (talk) 23:08, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:08, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:08, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:08, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

• Merge to an appropriate narrative on the Huey P. Newton page. I reread WP:VICTIM before commenting just to dust off the cobwebs, and I think she qualifies, because as GRuban points out, her career itself seems unnotable. If the attack itself is deemed notable, I think that would work perfectly fine on the attacker's page until it goes so large it needs to be split off - at which point, an event page for a crime would likely be more appropriate. Yvarta (talk) 23:08, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
• Delete Half the content is about Elaine Brown, not the subject. This is definitely a case of BLP1E, the assault on her by the Black Panthers. Chris Troutman (talk) 01:40, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

• Delete: Not notable enough for an article. Shallownotthou (talk) 12:57, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
• Delete -- The person managing the catering even for a notable organisation (which Black Panthers are/were) is unlikely to be notable. Peterkingiron (talk) 12:16, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

:*Counterpoint: Charlie Ayers. But still, agreed. Merge as content is sourced. Blythwood (talk) 01:04, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

• Merge - Shame to lose the info. Maybe merge it with Huey Newton, Black Panthers and/or Elaine Brown article.JaneSwifty (talk) 13:06, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
• Keep This article is horribly written. Notable - absolutely. Needs cleanup, expansion and improved referencing, not deletion per WP:ATD. Hmlarson (talk) 04:59, 13 September 2016 (UTC)
• Redirect to Black Panther Party#1977–82, where I just [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Black_Panther_Party&type=revision&diff=739227280&oldid=739035052 added] Davis's significance to the history of that subject (so, sort of, Merge). Given it was the reason Brown left, and Brown's significance in the history of the organization, it seemed good to include there. I looked for more to justify a stand-alone article but just don't see it. I see statements that she was a leader in the BP's Oakland school, but very little detail. Mostly it's just the tragedy of her being beaten and how that affected Brown. Even if there's a weak case for WP:BIO (though it would be very weak), it seems WP:VICTIM and WP:NOPAGE would apply. WP:VICTIM because while she clearly did a lot more, that's what we have sources about. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 14:04, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

::Delete' or merge to Huey Newton or Elain Brown. I tried to make this article longer and insert facts, but all the mentions are passing mentions. Her beating is notable for the black panther party but subject isn't notable herself. BlackAmerican (talk) 19:02, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.