Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rel (DBMS)

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=Wikipedia%3AXFDcloser%2FSoft_deletion_refund_preload&preloadparams%5b%5d={{urlencode:Rel (DBMS)}}&preloadparams%5b%5d={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rel (DBMS)}}&editintro=Wikipedia%3AXFDcloser%2FSoft_deletion_refund_intro&preloadtitle={{urlencode:Rel (DBMS)}}§ion=new&title=Wikipedia%3ARequests_for_undeletion&create=Request request the article's undeletion]. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:27, 7 January 2024 (UTC)

=[[:Rel (DBMS)]]=

:{{la|1=Rel (DBMS)}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Rel (DBMS)}})

Non-notable software. Two of the sources are simply about the relational model this product aims to implement, with no mention of the product itself. The third source is a non-independent promotional page. The website gives no indication that it's widely used, and the code has fewer than 100 stars on Github. Ghosts of Europa (talk) 21:08, 24 December 2023 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Computing and Software. Deltaspace⁴² (talk • contribs) 21:24, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
Delete. Doesn't meet WP:NSOFT. Deltaspace⁴² (talk • contribs) 21:26, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 08:52, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
Comment: Not an easy search term; I have added a notification to the article/software author who may be able to indicate any independent coverage which it has received. AllyD (talk) 08:57, 25 December 2023 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:21, 31 December 2023 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.