Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Remarkable Current

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Fails basic notabillity requirements. The inclusion of two identical sources did not assert notability. seicer | talk | contribs 04:51, 14 January 2009 (UTC)

=[[Remarkable Current]]=

:{{la|Remarkable Current}} ([{{fullurl:Remarkable Current|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Remarkable Current}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

I can't find any reliable source that show notability. Fails WP:CORP. Schuym1 (talk) 01:39, 5 January 2009 (UTC)

Delete: Complete college stupidity. South Bay (talk) 02:11, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- Raven1977 (talk) 03:52, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. -- Raven1977 (talk) 03:52, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
Keep--I think there's some notability here; I found two references, both of them solid, and have added them to the article. No doubt someone who actually knows this stuff can do a better job than me. Needless to say, there's no "college stupitidy" here. Drmies (talk) 04:22, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
Keep - squeaks by WP:N, which is the usual threshold for inclusion. Doesn't seem to warrent an exception. Wily D 19:58, 5 January 2009 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Aitias // discussion 00:03, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

Delete. Both the sources added by Drmies are reproductions of the same AP article. Here are few more reproductions ([http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6576281/], [http://community.seattletimes.nwsource.com/archive/?date=20041205&slug=muslimhiphop05], [http://www.pe.com/entertainment/stories/PE_Fea_Ent_muslim_hiphop.e762.html]). Moreover, the news article focuses on Muslim hip-hop and includes only a mention of this record label. This coverage does not justify inclusion under WP:CORP. ^LeaveSleaves 19:19, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
Delete: insufficient reliable 3rd party sources WP:CORP. JamesBurns (talk) 07:17, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.