Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Remigiusz Maciaszek

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure) ^BE _CK ^Y _SA ^{Y L}E _S 02:10, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

=[[Remigiusz Maciaszek]]=

:{{la|Remigiusz Maciaszek}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Remigiusz_Maciaszek Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Remigiusz Maciaszek}})

My original prod stated "The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (biographies) requirement." Deprodded by creator after the following expansion: [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Remigiusz_Maciaszek&diff=638528581&oldid=638496964]. I still think it fails, per WP:NOTNEWS: passing coverage in sources of poor reliability and few seconds of spotlight on tv is not enough, IMHO. Nor is a game box mention sufficient. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 06:22, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. ({{find video game sources short|Remigiusz Maciaszek|linksearch=}}) • Gene93k (talk) 16:44, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:44, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:44, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:44, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Michig (talk) 14:30, 26 December 2014 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Rcsprinter₁₂₃ (drawl) @ 18:25, 1 January 2015 (UTC)

Comment - as it stands this article will presumably either be soft deleted or kept as no consensus, but if kept it should be moved to RockAlone2k as per the norm; as examples, we have articles located at "PewDiePie" and "iJustine", but not at "Felix Kjellberg" or "Justine Ezarik". Satellizer (´ ･ ω ･ `) 6:53, 8 January 2015 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.