Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Renmark Rovers FC
=[[Renmark Rovers FC]]=
:{{la|Renmark Rovers FC}} – (
:({{Find sources|Renmark Rovers FC}})
fails WP:ORG nothing in gnews [http://news.google.com.au/archivesearch?as_q=&num=10&hl=en&btnG=Search+Archives&as_epq=Renmark+Rovers+Football+Club&as_oq=&as_eq=&ned=au&as_user_ldate=&as_user_hdate=&lr=&as_src=&as_price=p0&as_scoring=a]. the article is basically a website for followers of the club, which play in a low level amateur league in South Australia. it is not like the Australian Football League or VFL. LibStar (talk) 06:18, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
- Keep Plenty of sources available for editors who wish to put more effort in than a desultory google search. Contrary to the unsupported claims of the nominator, the Riverland Football League, while not in the top level of the Australian rules football pyramid (as far as one exists in Australian rules) is by no means amateur - with some players and coaches paid reasonable sums. It goes without saying that the article needs tidying up but that is not a reason to delete. -- Mattinbgn\talk 06:38, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
:: please provide sources then. nothing appears from a gnews search, this is the support to my claim. it is not a total professional league. LibStar (talk) 06:55, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:07, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:07, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.