Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Representative of Montserrat, London

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (WP:NPASR). (Non-administrator closure) NorthAmerica1000 04:57, 27 June 2014 (UTC)

=[[Representative of Montserrat, London]]=

:{{la|Representative of Montserrat, London}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Representative_of_Montserrat,_London Stats])

:({{Find sources|Representative of Montserrat, London}})

fails WP:ORG. this does not even have embassy or consulate status. And it is only an office within the building pictured not the whole building. Also nominating:

LibStar (talk) 12:21, 31 May 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:23, 31 May 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Caribbean-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:23, 31 May 2014 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:23, 31 May 2014 (UTC)

  • Keep -- This is a poor stub, but colonial governments have a representative in the mother country. They are now "overseas territories", not colonies, but their mission in the UK should notable. Since they are not independent, they will have no other diplomatic missions, as theri foreign affairs are dealt with by the UK Foreign Office. Peterkingiron (talk) 20:02, 6 June 2014 (UTC)

:: this still fails WP:GNG. Diplomatic missions are not inherently notable. LibStar (talk) 15:08, 7 June 2014 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 09:02, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 02:03, 19 June 2014 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.