Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Retro duo

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. MBisanz ^talk 00:13, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

=[[Retro duo]]=

:{{la|Retro duo}} ([{{fullurl:Retro duo|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Retro duo}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Contested prod. Game console with no assertion of notability. Delete. Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 00:46, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

Comment. This is a perfect example of why when an editor prods an article, he should also add that article to his watchlist. -- Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 00:46, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
Comment - before I form an opinion on this article, I will save people the trouble of trying to find any sources per WP:RS. This is what is out there, [http://www.battlecreekenquirer.com/article/20090226/ENTERTAINMENT01/902260308 Battle Creek Enquirer blog article], [http://news.cnet.com/8301-17938_105-10172320-1.html CNET Gadget Review], [http://www.examiner.com/x-2939-Chicago-Gadgets-Examiner~y2009m3d7-Retro-Duo-NESSNES-Game-System-resurects-your-old-cartridges and a blogger from The Examiner]. To be quite honest I really don't see these as that reliable so I am leaning delete for now. -Marcusmax(speak) 01:24, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. MrKIA11 (talk) 23:38, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
Delete No reliable sources, fails WP:NOTE.--Sloane (talk) 02:00, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
Keep per precedent set for such articles. Current sources squeek by. The Examiner cite is the "blog" of Zach Rhoads, a software developer and the Examiner's online expert explicitly hired as their "Chicago Gadgets Examiner". The Battle Creek Enquirer cite is the "blog" of Marcus Anderson, a freelance writer and video game reviewer hired for his expertise. Neither are simply some fan's blog posting... as they are opinions offered by experts in their field specifically qualified to speak on the subject... just as is the CNET review. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 07:45, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
Keep per the improvement by the ARS's. ;-) MuZemike 15:27, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
Keep referenced at the CES show at [http://gear.ign.com/articles/943/943384p1.html IGN] and you can buy it here [http://www.amazon.com/Retro-Video-System-Not-Machine-Specific/dp/B0012NZGJE Amazon] Kagetto (talk) 15:54, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.