Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Retrocrush

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Enigma^msg 18:42, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

=[[:Retrocrush]]=

:{{la|Retrocrush}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Retrocrush Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Retrocrush}})

Run of the mill website, not notable enough. 2Joules (talk) 04:02, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 09:13, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

Delete No reliable sources to indicate how this meets WP:GNG or WP:WEB guidelines. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 20:32, 7 June 2018 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Yunshui ^雲 _水 08:09, 12 June 2018 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Yunshui ^雲 _水 09:56, 19 June 2018 (UTC)

Delete: An article about a website, sourced only to its Alexa rating as at 2014. There have been some passing mentions for this website's worst-this-or-that polls, but I am seeing no :WP:RS coverage to establish its notability. Fails :WP:NWEB and :WP:GNG. AllyD (talk) 14:00, 19 June 2018 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.