Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Return to the Source

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Drmies (talk) 02:33, 5 February 2012 (UTC)

=[[Return to the Source]]=

:{{la|Return to the Source}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|Return to the Source}})

Dance club documented by their own compilation releases. Does not appear to meet WP:ORG or WP:MUSIC. ▫ JohnnyMrNinja 03:20, 22 January 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:26, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:26, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talkabout my edits? 17:10, 29 January 2012 (UTC)

  • Keep. A cradle of Trance music. I've added eight WP:RS sources and several lines of additional text. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 04:00, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
  • Keep. An important club in the history of Trance music, as confirmed by sources discussing it.--Michig (talk) 07:11, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
  • Keep per provided sources. Passes WP:MUSIC and WP:GNG. Cavarrone (talk) 08:32, 4 February 2012 (UTC)
  • Keep. Meets our notability guidelines.--Epeefleche (talk) 19:42, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.