Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Revolutionary spontaneity

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Clear consensus that nomination failed to present valid deletion criteria. (non-admin closure) Ifnord (talk) 19:21, 6 January 2019 (UTC)

=[[:Revolutionary spontaneity]]=

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|Revolutionary spontaneity}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Revolutionary_spontaneity Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Revolutionary spontaneity}})

Not NPOV

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 22:16, 31 December 2018 (UTC)

  • Keep per WP:VAGUEWAVE. Andrew D. (talk) 23:16, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Speedy keep No valid reason for deletion provided. Merry Christmas and Happy New Year, GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 23:54, 31 December 2018 (UTC)
  • Speedy keep. Even if the claim is true* that the current content violates NPOV, it is not a valid argument for deletion. The solution is to improve the content, not to delete this article on a notable concept. *I for one don't see what the NPOV problem is.  --Lambiam 16:37, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
  • Speedy keep: I see no WP:NPOV violations. Sure, the content needs fleshing out, perhaps mentioning that it is admired and the myth of a Menshevik-style revolution which required spontaneity was kept up for years because it was a founding principle of the USSR as opposed to a Bolshevik-style revolution where a small number of trained people take key installations. Hey, I might do it myself when I've got the sourcing together. Either way, this is a misguided AFD. SITH (talk) 21:55, 5 January 2019 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.