Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reza Sattar

:{{la|Reza Sattar}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Reza_Sattar Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Reza Sattar}})

The Biography about the Bangladesh-Canadian author does not cite a single reliable source. Anyone can self publish a book on Amazon but does that mean Wikipedia should have articles on everyone who has done so? The article is not neutral, borderline advertising about a subject who does not appear to be notable. I failed to find any sources from a quick google news search. Vinegarymass911 (talk) 19:48, 22 February 2018 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. Every morning (there's a halo...) 20:07, 22 February 2018 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Every morning (there's a halo...) 20:08, 22 February 2018 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Every morning (there's a halo...) 20:08, 22 February 2018 (UTC)

• Delete No WP:RS on page and my searches find nothing. Zilch. Zero. Nada. Toolbar gets hits on a Bangladeshi immigrant shopkeeper in Canada and one in New York with the same name - but nothing matching this bio. Appears to be a pure vanity or PROMO page.E.M.Gregory (talk) 00:15, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
• Delete. People are not automatically entitled to have an article on Wikipedia for promotional reasons just because they exist, but this is not referenced to any reliable source coverage about the subject for the purposes of passing WP:GNG. Bearcat (talk) 21:20, 23 February 2018 (UTC)
• delete There is no significant independent coverage and nothing to show his book is notable.Sandals1 (talk) 16:54, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
• Delete.No RS for this person. Deathlibrarian (talk) 01:51, 1 March 2018 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.