Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rhonda Harris Taylor

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 03:23, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

=[[Rhonda Harris Taylor]]=

:{{la|Rhonda Harris Taylor}} – (View AfDView log{{•}} {{plainlink|1=http://toolserver.org/~betacommand/cgi-bin/afdparser?afd={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rhonda Harris Taylor}}|2=AfD statistics}})

:({{findsources|Rhonda Harris Taylor}})

I initially declined a speedy deletion but it does not appear that she meets the notability standard for academics Wikipedia:Notability (academics) Polargeo (talk) 09:04, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. —Polargeo (talk) 09:08, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
Delete - not notable. (GregJackP (talk) 10:17, 14 April 2010 (UTC))
Delete, basically per nom. I did a bit of digging on google, but also did not find anything sufficiently significant to indicate academic notability under WP:PROF. Nsk92 (talk) 17:25, 16 April 2010 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.