Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ribble Link Trust

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__ to Ribble Link. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:38, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

=[[:Ribble Link Trust]]=

:{{la|1=Ribble Link Trust}} – (View AfDView log | edits since nomination)

:({{Find sources AFD|title=Ribble Link Trust}})

Unnotable subject on it's own, WP:MERGE to the main article on the Ribble Link or delete. -Samoht27 (talk) 05:11, 28 December 2024 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Transportation, and United Kingdom. -Samoht27 (talk) 05:11, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 07:26, 28 December 2024 (UTC)
Redirect to Ribble Link or delete. There's this [https://www.lep.co.uk/lifestyle/how-the-age-of-canal-building-returned-to-lancashire-113966] but on its own isn't sufficient to pass GNG/NORG. If as it seems the Trust is associated with the one project then it makes sense to include info. there. The Trust is mentioned in the target article - it could perhaps have a subheading there. Don't think the content needs merging as it's not supported by citations. Rupples (talk) 12:31, 28 December 2024 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.