Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rich Raddon

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus with leave to speedy renominate. Ron Ritzman (talk) 03:30, 18 December 2010 (UTC)

=[[Rich Raddon]]=

:{{la|Rich Raddon}} – (View AfDView log){{•}} {{plainlink|1=http://toolserver.org/~betacommand/reports/afd/{{urlencode:Rich Raddon}}.html|2=Afd statistics}}

:({{Find sources|Rich Raddon}})

WP:BLP1E: this person has an entry because of one controversial event (their resignation). Passing mentions in news stories about a minor website they co-founded don't negate this. Nor does having a notable brother. Rd232 ^talk 11:01, 27 November 2010 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:11, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:12, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
Comment Not quite a BLP1E, as per sources is far better known as director (and former director) of the Los Angeles Film Festival, for which he has far more coverage since 2001 than for anything else.[http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=%22Rich+Raddon%22&scoring=a] Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 22:29, 27 November 2010 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:39, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:27, 11 December 2010 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.