Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richa sorot

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mkativerata (talk) 06:37, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

=[[Richa sorot]]=

:{{la|Richa sorot}} – (View AfDView log{{•}} {{plainlink|1=http://toolserver.org/~betacommand/cgi-bin/afdparser?afd={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richa sorot}}|2=AfD statistics}})

:({{Find sources|Richa sorot}})

Contested PROD. Non-notable person- fails WP:GNG and WP:PERSON Reconsider ! 06:40, 13 September 2010 (UTC)

Delete, no sources to show notability per WP:BIO. NawlinWiki (talk) 19:03, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:45, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:45, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:45, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
Delete. This is little more than WP:PROMOTION with no independent WP:RS. Uncontroversial case. Respectfully, Agricola44 (talk) 14:10, 15 September 2010 (UTC).
Delete. I don't see any basis for notability in the article, so it's a plausible WP:CSD#A7 speedy deletion, either as {{tl|db-bio}} or {{tl|db-web}}. —David Eppstein (talk) 07:17, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
Delete. Seems to be promotional to me too, and I see no notability established and no citations from reliable sources. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 12:39, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
Speedy delete, A7. Hairhorn (talk) 13:06, 16 September 2010 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.