Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard Easter

:{{la|Richard Easter}} ([{{fullurl:Richard Easter|wpReason={{urlencode:AfD discussion: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard Easter}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

Simply too marginal a writer. No significant third-party coverage (sources are IMDb, his agent and his old buddy). Pichpich (talk) 19:15, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

• Question about WP:MUSIC: does writing a song that charts count for notability? One is sufficient for a performer, but how many would it take for the writer? —Quasirandom (talk) 00:29, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

:Well we're not talking about Billie Jean here... Pichpich (talk) 01:58, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

---

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 10:24, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

• Weak Delete. The sidekick of Steve Wright part's the reason I've classed it as weak. Esteffect (talk) 02:53, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
• Weak keep - sources can be found out there. Bearian (talk) 18:28, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

:Sources that allow for the development of an article beyond a two-line sub-stub? Pichpich (talk) 19:08, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

• Weak Keep - if more sources can be found. He certainly appears to pass notability, just doesn't have coverage. Bardcom (talk) 19:45, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
• Keep. Aside from IMDb, seem to be plenty of independent sources at Google. --Oldak Quill 21:11, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
• Delete - what are required are secondary sources about him, rather than by him. Fails WP:BIO. BlueValour (talk) 23:28, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
• Keep Useful article, can be sourced. - cohesion 01:46, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.