Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard Fredric Grenvile

:{{la|Richard Fredric Grenvile}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|Richard Fredric Grenvile}})

From the deleted PROD: No indication of notability. 6 results for 'Richard Fredric Grenvile' via Google, which suggests a decisive lack of notability for the 'pen name' of this individual. Eeekster (talk) 02:58, 13 April 2011 (UTC)

:* Delete: fails WP:N.  Mephistophelian † 03:03, 13 April 2011 (UTC)

:* Delete: WP:TOOSOON. Normally book becomes notable when best seller (but Neverwas: ... released last month, hasn't, at least not yet), then author (unless wins major author award, not book award) with second contract (may still be same series if WP:RS say separate contract), then pen name, unless pen name was only name public initially; note Stephen King's Richard Bachman has an article, but Isaac Asimov's Paul French goes only to disambiguation page. Pen name article might bypass WP:BLP issues, but not WP:N, which have not been met yet. Dru of Id (talk) 23:19, 13 April 2011 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:07, 14 April 2011 (UTC)

• Delete Non-notable pen name for a non-notable author of a non-notable book. Not a tough call. Funniest aspect of this article: the tag at the top of the article saying "For other people named Richard Fredric Grenvile, see Richard Fredric Grenvile (disambiguation)". --MelanieN (talk) 01:58, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
• Delete - No indication of notability. -- Joaquin008 ^(talk) 16:48, 20 April 2011 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.