Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard Longworth
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=Wikipedia%3AXFDcloser%2FSoft_deletion_refund_preload&preloadparams%5b%5d={{urlencode:Richard Longworth}}&preloadparams%5b%5d={{urlencode:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard Longworth}}&editintro=Wikipedia%3AXFDcloser%2FSoft_deletion_refund_intro&preloadtitle={{urlencode:Richard Longworth}}§ion=new&title=Wikipedia%3ARequests_for_undeletion&create=Request request the article's undeletion]. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 19:04, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
=[[:Richard Longworth]]=
:{{la|Richard Longworth}} – (
:({{Find sources AFD|Richard Longworth}})
Clearly fails WP:NCRIMINAL Rogermx (talk) 21:17, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. Rogermx (talk) 21:17, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of South Carolina-related deletion discussions. Rogermx (talk) 21:17, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
- Comment: The similar article David Rocheville, about his partner in the murders, should probably also be AfD'd. Somehow an unrelated comment about YouTube appears in this AfD in the list for June 29th. RobDuch (talk·contribs) 08:34, 4 July 2020 (UTC)
{{clear}}
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.