Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard Mounce

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|Richard Mounce}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Richard_Mounce Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Richard Mounce}})

No independent sources. Probably a vanity page by a patient or associate. Ian.thomson (talk) 22:37, 19 February 2020 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Oregon-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:42, 19 February 2020 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:43, 19 February 2020 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of South Dakota-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:43, 19 February 2020 (UTC)

• Delete - Fails WP:NBIO No notability claimed and all references are non-independent. Creator seems to be a single purpose account with an undeclared CoI. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:42, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
• Delete Self-promotional page. PenulisHantu (talk) 13:47, 20 February 2020 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. This has been around since 2010? Yikes. shoy (reactions) 14:48, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
• Delete seems to be a result of WP:COI from an WP:SPA.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 20:40, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
• Delete, No independent sources, fails notability Alex-h (talk) 11:21, 22 February 2020 (UTC)
• Delete No independent sourcing, likely created to boost the subject's online presence. Best, GPL93 (talk) 20:55, 24 February 2020 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.