Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard Parnell Habersham

{{ns:0|B}}

:{{la|Richard Parnell Habersham}} – (View AfD)(View log)

Clear autobiography and conflict of interest as noted by User:RJASE1 at WP:COIN. Notability is borderline. There are no references. YechielMan 08:39, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

• Comment Neither WP:AUTO nor WP:COI are cause for deletion. Subject does not appear to meet notability guidelines as an actor (which guidelines I believe are way too strict, but maybe that's just me). Seems even less notable as a journalist. But article is new and well-tagged, so I'd like to see if editor(s) can show references that establish notability before I weigh in with an opinion. Capmango 21:00, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
• Well, I guess Delete, because 6 days have gone by and no one has edited the article to establish notability. Capmango 18:46, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
• And on the seventh day, the article was fixed quite nicely. Change my vote to keep. Capmango 16:59, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and actresses-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 10:32, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
• Keep without neglecting its need for references and cleanup. — Athaenara ✉ 01:44, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

:* Update: Except for the unreferenced "Journalism" section, the article is up to NPOV snuff. — Athaenara ✉ 01:36, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

---

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nishkid64 (talk) 18:00, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

• Keep, notability is borderline, but it is now well referenced. John Vandenberg 21:13, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.