Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard Watts (author)

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 21:31, 19 March 2018 (UTC)

=[[:Richard Watts (author)]]=

:{{la|Richard Watts (author)}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Richard_Watts_(author) Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Richard Watts (author)}})

A non-notable author; None of the references are about him, only about his books or random news articles where he is quoted. Both of his books were published through Greenleaf Book Group which "is based on a business model where the author pays for the publishing". For "Emerald Book Company" note [http://www.independentpublisher.com/article.php?page=1660]. power~enwiki (π, ν) 20:41, 12 March 2018 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 06:53, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 06:53, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 12:11, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

:Delete - previously speedied three times, but the creator just doesn't seem to have got the message. Deb (talk) 19:55, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

It's not fair to say the creator hasn't gotten the message. The last two speedied versions were nowhere near as promotional as the first (history now at Draft:Richard Watts (author)), and unlike all three, the currently-visible version at least makes some effort at pointing out third-party coverage. That coverage doesn't amount to what's needed to meet our inclusion criteria, however. Delete. —Cryptic 00:43, 14 March 2018 (UTC)
They weren't speedied for G11, they were speedied for A7.Deb (talk) 09:24, 14 March 2018 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.