Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rick Smith (author)

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Tone 22:40, 17 November 2019 (UTC)

=[[:Rick Smith (author)]]=

:{{la|Rick Smith (author)}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Rick_Smith_(author) Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Rick Smith (author)}})

Not notable.

Online searches have found no sources independent of the subject of the article.

Article history shows no substantial changes or edits by anyone other than the article's creator. Issues raised in February 2011, shortly after the article was created, do not appear to be addressed: it's an orphan, it cites no sources independent of the article's subject, it promotes the subject in a subjective manner. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hmee2 (talk • contribs) 13:18, 3 November 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 12:34, 3 November 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:19, 3 November 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Georgia (U.S. state)-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:20, 3 November 2019 (UTC)

Weak keep the guy was [https://www.forbes.com/sites/danschawbel/2012/01/31/simple-changes-that-can-propel-your-career/#317b61632108 interviewed] in Forbes and contributed several articles to Forbes as an author [https://www.forbes.com/sites/ricksmith/2015/06/22/henry-ford-3d-printing-and-the-new-economics-of-manufacturing/#4e8e8ddb4d26], [https://www.forbes.com/sites/ricksmith/2014/07/14/the-seven-deadly-sins-of-large-company-innovation/#76ee91f9f1f5], [https://www.forbes.com/sites/ricksmith/2014/08/18/skill-effort-or-luck-which-is-more-important-for-success/#42ad074049ba]. He is [https://www.huffingtonpost.ca/author/richard-smith/ featured] in Huffington Post Canada.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 16:57, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

{{resize|91%|Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:59, 10 November 2019 (UTC)

KEEP He is a bestselling writer. Did anyone who read what he has accomplished listed in the Huffington Post [https://www.huffingtonpost.ca/author/richard-smith/] doubt he is notable? Dream Focus 18:59, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Comments. Without taking sides, an online search would be difficult for a newbie much less a teacher with two graduate degrees and 12 years' experience on Wikipedia; in addition to several other Rick Smiths on Wikipedia, there's the Axon guy, a baseball player, and a police chief with the same name. Bearian (talk) 18:25, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
Comment WP:AUTHOR I cannot confirm where he was a bestselling author. It matters. It is a claim repeated, however it was not NY Times. So not sure it confers notability. [https://www.huffingtonpost.ca/author/richard-smith/ Huffington Post reads like a resume and does not look to have editorial oversight]. Wm335td (talk) 22:09, 15 November 2019 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.