Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Riley Stavros
=[[Riley Stavros]]=
:{{la|Riley Stavros}} ([{{fullurl:Riley Stavros|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Riley Stavros}}&action=delete}} delete]) –
Minor character appearing in one episode. No independent reliable sources provided or found. SummerPhD (talk) 18:55, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
- Merge to List_of_Degrassi:_The_Next_Generation_characters#Minor_characters. This is where the other minor characters are presented. ThemFromSpace 20:14, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. KuyaBriBriTalk 20:19, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. KuyaBriBriTalk 20:19, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
- Delete He is actually a main character in season 8 of Degrassi: The Next Generation; however, he doesn't meet current notability thresholds as he hasn't received coverage in third party sources. Matthewedwards : Chat 06:16, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton | Talk 00:49, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
- Redirect I'm not sure why this needed to be brought to AfD. ChildofMidnight (talk) 03:23, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
- Merge to List of Degrassi: The Next_Generation characters. This person hasn't received any significant coverage in reliable sources, so he's not notable enough for a separate article. I'm not sure whether or not he's a minor character, as he's appeared in 10 episodes and may or may not be shown in the opening credits. I see no reason he shouldn't be listed with the other characters from the series, whether main or minor. Timmeh 15:22, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
- Merge He does not have to be notable to be part of a merged article, and that's the easy solution. But I do point out there are no guidelines for these that have ever achieved consensus, and there isn't even consensus that the GNG is applicable. At this point, anyone who wants to remove them will have to get consensus for each starting from something that is generally accepted. The only thing I can think of is the general concept of unencyclopedic, and that can obviously be interpreted in many ways. DGG (talk) 03:26, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.