Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ringvebanen

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 22:16, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

=[[Ringvebanen]]=

:{{la|Ringvebanen}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|Ringvebanen}})

Unreferenced, unnotable football field which is a contested PROD. I cannot find any reliable sources which provide any significant coverage (beyond the simple fact that the field actually exists) and it has never hosted a high-division team which would make it inherently notable. The article even claims the field is not large enough for matches, and is simply used as a training pitch for a local team. There are probably a thousand equally non-notable fields, just in Norway. Arsenikk ^(talk) 22:03, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. —Arsenikk ^(talk) 22:09, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Norway-related deletion discussions. —Arsenikk ^(talk) 22:09, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
Delete fails WP:GNG. 1 gnews hit [http://news.google.com/archivesearch?&as_src=-newswire+-wire+-presswire+-PR+-release+-wikipedia&q=%22Ringvebanen%22]. LibStar (talk) 07:44, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 17:08, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
Delete - training pitch for a minor team not even notable enough for its own article? Methinks not...Giant Snowman 17:09, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
Delete - per nom. This does not appear to be a notable pitch. Sir Sputnik (talk) 23:16, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
Red card Foul against wp:notability. No prejudice against returning for the next match with wp:reliable and wp:verifiable sources asserting it. ^walk victor falk^talk 05:33, 15 February 2011 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.