Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rinil Gowtham

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  12:37, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

=[[Rinil Gowtham]]=

:{{la|Rinil Gowtham}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Rinil_Gowtham Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Rinil Gowtham}})

This is another Rajeshbieee/Gantlet related article. It has the same issues with sourcing and it was deCSDed with the rationale to send to AfD. A search for sources finds non-reliable sources such as IMdB. Dat GuyTalkContribs 11:37, 7 January 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:42, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:42, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:46, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

  • Delete as not yet seemingly better satisfying the notability guidelines. Notifying tagger {{U|Josu4u}}. SwisterTwister talk 19:51, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
  • Delete Fails WP:GNG and WP:FILMMAKER at present is upcoming may be notable in the future.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 13:46, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
  • Delete - Definitely doesn't pass WP:FILMMAKER, and searches did not turn up enough in-depth coverage from independent reliable sources to show they pass WP:GNG. Onel5969 TT me 12:15, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.