Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Riverside Centre 2
{{#ifeq:{{#titleparts:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|2}}|Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log|{{collapse top|bg=#F3F9FF|1=Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Riverside Centre 2|padding=1px}}|}}
=[[Riverside Centre 2]]=
:{{la|Riverside Centre 2}} ([{{fullurl:Riverside Centre 2|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Riverside Centre 2}}&action=delete}} delete]) –
:({{findsources|Riverside Centre 2}})
Notability not addressed due to a lack of non-speculative sources. There are no articles on Google News that are not speculative and sourced by press releases by GPT. This article fails WP:CRYSTAL as there is no evidence of a firm commitment to any such development. Ash (talk) 16:35, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. -- -SpacemanSpiffCalvin‡Hobbes 18:05, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. Best review this once it gets out of the "Proposed" stage, and into more of a "building it" stage. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 22:08, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
- Delete One One One Eagle Street is being built at the site instead or else the location description is incorrect. - Shiftchange (talk) 07:49, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
{{#ifeq:{{#titleparts:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|2}}|Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log|{{collapse bottom}}|}}