Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert D. Rush

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 05:30, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

=[[Robert D. Rush]]=

:{{la|Robert D. Rush}} – (View AfDView log{{•}} [http://toolserver.org/~snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Robert_D._Rush Stats])

:({{Find sources|Robert D. Rush}})

I'm not seeing much notice of an elected "Stated Clerk" in a relatively small (<50K) Presbyterian denomination. Clarityfiend (talk) 10:39, 25 July 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 11:39, 25 July 2012 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:09, 25 July 2012 (UTC)

  • Delete I'm finding no reason to believe this seemingly minor church official is notable. Ducknish (talk) 15:56, 25 July 2012 (UTC)

::Note - I intned to adjust links to the article. Peterkingiron (talk) 17:07, 28 July 2012 (UTC)

  • Delete: Not notable, not enough secondary sources, fails WP:GNG.Jimsteele9999 (talk) 18:28, 25 July 2012 (UTC)
  • Delete -- without an article on General Assembly of the Cumberland Presbyterian Church, it is difficult to judge its significance but I presume it is the governing body of the Cumberland Presbyterian Church. This is a denomination with under 50,000 members in 800 congregations (according to that article). Unless some one will tell us that the "stated clerk" is the equivalent of a moderator or a bishop, with real power over the denomination, as opposed to being as mere functionary (as the title implies). I cannot belive that this is a notable position.

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.