Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Hastings Hunkins (2nd nomination)
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedy kept per the Snowball clause. Royalbroil 02:18, 9 March 2015 (UTC)
=[[Robert Hastings Hunkins]]=
- {{Special:Prefixindex/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Hastings Hunkins}}
:{{la|Robert Hastings Hunkins}} – (
:({{Find sources AFD|Robert Hastings Hunkins}})
No notability. Fails WP:GNG. -- WV ● ✉ ✓ 03:48, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
:Keep Hunkins served in the Vermont General Assembly and state legislators are notable. Until 1836, the Vermont General Assembly was unicameral when the Vermont Senate was added. Thank you-RFD (talk) 08:31, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
- Speedy keep per WP:NPOL. -- Calidum 20:23, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
- Speedy Keep per above (state legislators get a free pass) and a note of caution to {{ping|Winkelvi}} that it may be unnecessary to go after every article created by Kbabej and to please check the notability criteria before nominating any more of them. Valfontis (talk) 08:32, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Vermont-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:57, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wisconsin-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:58, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:58, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.