Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Henry Cox

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. joe decker ^{talk to me} 15:48, 19 April 2011 (UTC)

=[[Robert Henry Cox]]=

:{{la|Robert Henry Cox}} – (View AfDView log)

:({{Find sources|Robert Henry Cox}})

Contested PROD. Rationale was "Doesn't warrant an entry. This reads like a vita" by User:Tulsa Kid. I am neutral. Jujutacular ^talk 23:06, 5 April 2011 (UTC)

:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. -- Jujutacular ^talk 23:14, 5 April 2011 (UTC)

Comment. Excellent citation record on GS with h index = 8. Not quite up to WP:Prof#C1 yet but maybe soon. Xxanthippe (talk) 23:20, 5 April 2011 (UTC).
Delete. This entry reads like a vanity entry to me. There are many more academics who have a much lengthier record but no entry.Tulsa Kid (talk) 01:19, 6 April 2011 (UTC)— Tulsa Kid (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

::See WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS Xxanthippe (talk) 03:02, 6 April 2011 (UTC).

:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:19, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

Weak delete as too early. Xxanthippe (talk) 00:55, 12 April 2011 (UTC).

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.