Login
Login

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Julius Trumpler

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep (non-admin closure), snowball keep. Pete.Hurd (talk) 16:33, 7 September 2008 (UTC)

=[[Robert Julius Trumpler]]=

:{{la|Robert Julius Trumpler}} ([{{fullurl:Robert Julius Trumpler|wpReason={{urlencode: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Julius Trumpler}}&action=delete}} delete]) – (View AfD)(View log)

no reliable secondary sources. the external link contains no information. Jessi1989 (talk) 17:05, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. — Eastmain (talk) 19:12, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep. [http://books.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=9977&page=277 Biographical Memoirs] V.78 (2000) from the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) is a reliable source. The fact that a crater on the moon is named after him is another argument for notability. See also [http://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=RJ+Trumpler+&hl=en&lr=&btnG=Search this Google Scholar search]. --Eastmain (talk) 19:12, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep - links indicate there is substantial biographical material about him, he has an extensive bibliography, and there is an award named in his honor [http://161.58.115.79/membership/awards/trumpler.html here] from a professional astronomy society. CactusWriter 19:28, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep due to results on Google scholar that verify the information and demonstrate notability. --Happy editing! Sincerely, Le Grand Roi des CitrouillesTally-ho! 19:45, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep. This is a no-brainer. Those NAS biographies are only published for people that are or were members of the US National Academy of Sciences.[http://books.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=9977&page=R7] Being a member of a National Academy satisfies WP:PROF. --Crusio (talk) 21:19, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep Well-sourced, clearly notable. Edward321 (talk) 01:53, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep. As Crusio noted, being an elected member of the United States National Academy of Sciences is already sufficient to satisfy Criterion 3 of WP:ACADEMIC. Nsk92 (talk) 00:42, 7 September 2008 (UTC)

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.