Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roberta Maley
=[[Roberta Maley]]=
:{{la|Roberta Maley}} – (
:({{findsources|Roberta Maley}})
Non-notable. One of the references is to a blog, which is probably not a WP:RS, so that leaves only one reference, which is not enough to establish notability. greenrd (talk) 05:58, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
- Delete or maybe Redirect to Spotify. The sources are fine but they don't offer much coverage of Maley herself. I also found [http://www.mediaweek.co.uk/news/rss/928991/Insiders-Guide-Spotify/ this] and [http://www.mad.co.uk/Main/Home/Articlex/9dad09ec3a444754adf18917fe1be67b/Double-dipping.html this]. Plausible search term perhaps given the coverage that exists.--Michig (talk) 12:40, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:25, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget 00:30, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
- Keep By any measure Roberta is notable! Francium12 00:23, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
:Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Arbitrarily0 (talk) 21:18, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
- Merge to Spotify. We have next to no information about her other than her working for this company. --GRuban (talk) 18:19, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
- Merge to Spotify. Her only possible notability comes from working for that company, and the sources I found talked more about Spotify than about Ms. Maley. --Darkwind (talk) 04:15, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.