Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roberto Liccardo

:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Scott Burley (talk) 02:52, 6 May 2019 (UTC)

=[[:Roberto Liccardo]]=

{{AFD help}}

:{{la|Roberto Liccardo}} – (View AfDView log{{int:dot-separator}} [https://tools.wmflabs.org/jackbot/snottywong/cgi-bin/votecounter.cgi?page=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Roberto_Liccardo Stats])

:({{Find sources AFD|Roberto Liccardo}})

Lack of notability, no coverage of person; book is self-published and all related material is promotional, with the exception of a single HuffPo piece, which does not suffice. Fails WP:NBIO, and the book per se would fail WP:NBOOK. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 15:10, 28 April 2019 (UTC) Elmidae (talk · contribs) 15:10, 28 April 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 15:36, 28 April 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 15:36, 28 April 2019 (UTC)

:Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. Icewhiz (talk) 15:36, 28 April 2019 (UTC)

  • Keep Article meets the notability criteria. Roberto Liccardo is an authoritative source when it comes to media coverage and marketing internationally; recently featured among others by Venezuela #1 newspaper http://www.el-nacional.com/noticias/empresas/ejecutivo-medios-internacionales-rol-concientizar_275790. He is the founder of GoodNoon, a company ranking #3 on the "Best Online Marketing Companies" TrustPilot chart https://www.trustpilot.com/categories/online-marketing, with coverage, among other large media, in Forbes https://www.forbes.com/sites/andrewarnold/2018/08/13/the-6-major-blockchain-trends-in-2018/#6e4130f423f9Johnvertel8 (talk) 19:20, 28 April 2019 (UTC)Johnvertel8 (talkcontribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

{{reflist-talk}}

::Tellingly, the Forbes article does not even mention his name. The TrustPilot listing is exactly that: a mention in a listing... of the company, not him. And the El Nacional piece is an interview where he is questioned about other topics; again, it's not about him. - I fear those don't do much for personal notability. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 19:30, 28 April 2019 (UTC)

::The Forbes article and Trustpilot ranking as best online marketing company refer to the company he founded and where he is currently working as CEO. The HuffingtonPost piece and the El Nacional article feature are notable sources featuring him directly. El Nacional piece is clearly not an interview, but it is an indipendent article recognizing Roberto Liccardo's international efforts to sensibilize media regarding the Venezuelan Crisis. Not sure what "interview where he is questioned about other topics" refers to, because the article starting from its title talks about Marketing and PR (PR in Spanish is translated as RP=Relaciones públicas, Medios=Media). Thus, I believe the notability criteria needed are met.

::*the Forbes column is not a WP:RS; just a personal column by one of Forbes' enormous stable of bloggers. And TrustPilot is NOT a WP:RS.E.M.Gregory (talk) 14:20, 1 May 2019 (UTC)

  • Keep The person has enough notability and proven tracks of success with the company he founded. He is covered by top media such as HuffingtonPost, El Nacional and Forbes. BOGLA (talk) 10:43, 29 April 2019 (UTC)BOGLA (talkcontribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
  • Delete as PROMO for a "marketing and growth hacker consultant, businessman and best-seller autho". Fails WP:GNG.E.M.Gregory (talk) 14:20, 1 May 2019 (UTC)

:*Note that both "keep" opinions are by SPAs.E.M.Gregory (talk) 20:18, 2 May 2019 (UTC)

{{clear}}

:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.