Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robolliance
:The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:37, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
=[[:Robolliance]]=
:{{la|Robolliance}} – (
:({{Find sources AFD|Robolliance}})
Subject fails WP:ORG and general notability guidelines. Tymon.r Do you have any questions? 22:18, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 00:02, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 00:02, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
:Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 00:02, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
- Delete as clear advertising in and out, both information and sources alone. SwisterTwister talk 01:52, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Non-notable in every sense of the word. sixtynine • speak up • 01:56, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
- Delete way too soon. If it stays around long enough to meet notability thresholds, try again later. But then write it neutral tone and use English instead of Marketing Capital Letter Usage. W Nowicki (talk) 19:21, 21 January 2017 (UTC)
- Delete doesn't meet our GNG DarjeelingTea (talk) 16:01, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
{{clear}}
:The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.